Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.532
Filtrar
1.
J Surg Res ; 265: 139-146, 2021 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33940236

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on what dose of norepinephrine corresponds with futility. The purpose of this study was to investigate the maximum infusion and cumulative doses of norepinephrine associated with survival for patients in medical and surgical intensive care units (MICU and SICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of 661 critically ill patients admitted to a large academic medical center who received norepinephrine. Univariate, multivariate, and area under the curve analyses with optimal cut offs for maximum infusion rate and cumulative dosage were determined by Youden Index. RESULTS: The population was 54.9% male, 75.8% white, and 58.7 ± 16.1 y old with 384 (69.8%) admitted to the MICU and 166 (30.2%) admitted to the SICU, including 38 trauma patients. Inflection points in mortality were seen at 18 mcg/min and 17.6 mg. The inflection point was higher in MICU patients at 21 mcg/min and lower in SICU patients at 11 mcg/min. MICU patients also had a higher maximum cumulative dosage of 30.7 mg, compared to 2.7 mg in SICU patients. In trauma patients, norepinephrine infusions up to 5 mcg/min were associated with a 41.7% mortality rate. CONCLUSION: A maximum rate of 18 mcg/min and cumulative dose of 17.6 mg were the inflection points for mortality risk in ICU patients, with SICU patients tolerating lower doses. In trauma patients, even low doses of norepinephrine were associated with higher mortality. These data suggest that MICU, SICU, and trauma patients differ in need for, response to, and outcome from escalating norepinephrine doses.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Estado Terminal/terapia , Futilidade Médica , Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ohio/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos e Lesões/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(11): 1292-1301, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33813873

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Intranasal sprays (INSs) are commonly used medications for the treatment of many rhinologic conditions. Despite their popularity, an analysis of a nationwide reporting database and comparison to the available literature has never been performed. METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was accessed to obtain adverse event (AE) records from 2014 to 2019 for varying INSs, including: 10 corticosteroids, 1 alpha adrenergic, and 3 antihistamines. The Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRR) and Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) were calculated for dyspnea, anosmia, ageusia/dysgeusia, epistaxis, and headache. A PRR ≥ 2 or ROR ≥ 1 was considered significant. RESULTS: Corticosteroids had 98 864 total reported AEs to the database, followed by antihistamines (7011) and alpha adrenergics (2071). In total, dyspnea was reported 5843 times, followed by headache (4230), epistaxis (1205), ageusia/dysgeusia (920), and anosmia (312). Overall, PRR and ROR values for dyspnea ranged from 0.51 to 4.25 and 0.51 to 4.49; for dysgeusia/ageusia from 0.56 to 6.09 and 0.56 to 6.12; and for epistaxis from 1.03 to 27.24 and 1.03 to 30.76, respectively. All medications which listed anosmia within the top AEs had PRR and ROR values exceeding 2 and 1, respectively. The PRR for headache exceeded 2 for 1 medication and the ROR exceeded 1 in 7 medications. CONCLUSION: The AEs of dyspnea, anosmia, ageusia/dysgeusia, epistaxis, and headache are reported within the FAERS database for commonly prescribed INSs. When compared against the existing scientific literature, the clinical significance of this reporting tool from the FDA for these classes of medications remains unvalidated.


Assuntos
Corticosteroides , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos , Sprays Nasais , Doenças Nasais/tratamento farmacológico , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Transversais , Bases de Dados Factuais/estatística & dados numéricos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/classificação , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/etiologia , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas dos Receptores Histamínicos/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
3.
Clin Toxicol (Phila) ; 59(10): 937-941, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33688777

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Caffeine poisoning may cause life-threatening arrhythmias and hemodynamic failure. We aimed to investigate the toxicokinetics (TK), toxicodynamics (TD) and TK/TD relationships of caffeine in a case of poisoning. CASE REPORT: A 47-year-old male ingested pure anhydrous caffeine powder (70 g) in a suicide attempt. He developed agitation, tachycardia, and two episodes of ventricular fibrillation treated with defibrillation and tracheal intubation. He was successfully managed using intravenous infusions of esmolol and norepinephrine. METHODS: We modelled the time-course of plasma caffeine concentration (TK study using online liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry), the time-course of blood lactate concentration and infusion rates of esmolol and norepinephrine (TD studies) and the TK/TD relationships. RESULTS: Caffeine TK was of first-order peaking at 258 mg/L with an elimination half-life of 46.2 h and clearance of 2.2 L/h. Caffeine-related effects on blood lactate (peak, 10 mmol/L at 1.25 h postingestion) were described by a Bateman-type equation (formation rate, 0.05 mmol/mg.h; elimination rate, 0.9 mmol/mg.h). Esmolol and norepinephrine infusion rates to reverse caffeine-related cardiovascular effects (peaks at 51-h postingestion) fitted well with a sigmoidal Emax model (EC50, 180.0 and 225.9 mg/L, respectively; Hill coefficient, 10.0). CONCLUSION: Massive caffeine ingestion is characterized by prolonged caffeine elimination. TK/TD relationships are helpful to quantify caffeine-related catecholaminergic effects.


Assuntos
Cafeína/envenenamento , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/envenenamento , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Tentativa de Suicídio , Taquicardia/induzido quimicamente , Fibrilação Ventricular/induzido quimicamente , Administração Oral , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Antagonistas de Receptores Adrenérgicos beta 1/administração & dosagem , Cafeína/administração & dosagem , Cafeína/farmacocinética , Cardiotoxicidade , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/administração & dosagem , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/farmacocinética , Cardioversão Elétrica , Meia-Vida , Humanos , Hiperlactatemia/induzido quimicamente , Infusões Intravenosas , Intubação Intratraqueal , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Pós , Propanolaminas/administração & dosagem , Taquicardia/diagnóstico , Taquicardia/fisiopatologia , Taquicardia/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento , Fibrilação Ventricular/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Ventricular/fisiopatologia , Fibrilação Ventricular/terapia
4.
Anesth Analg ; 132(2): 420-429, 2021 02 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33264119

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Diastolic dysfunction is a risk factor for postoperative major cardiovascular events. During anesthesia, patients with diastolic dysfunction might experience impaired hemodynamic function and worsening of diastolic function, which in turn, might be associated with a higher incidence of postoperative complications.We aimed to investigate whether patients with diastolic dysfunction require higher doses of norepinephrine during general anesthesia. Furthermore, we aimed to examine the association between the grade of diastolic dysfunction and the E/e' ratio during anesthesia. A high E/e' ratio corresponds to elevated filling pressures and is an important measure of impaired diastolic function. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study at a German university hospital from February 2017 to September 2018. Patients aged ≥60 years and undergoing general anesthesia (ie, propofol and sevoflurane) for elective noncardiac surgery were enrolled. Exclusion: mitral valve disease, atrial fibrillation, and implanted mechanical device.The primary outcome parameter was the administered dose of norepinephrine within 30 minutes after anesthesia induction (µg·kg-1 30 min-1). The secondary outcome parameter was the change of Doppler echocardiographic E/e' from ECHO1 (baseline) to ECHO2 (anesthesia). Linear models and linear mixed models were used for statistical evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 247 patients were enrolled, and 200 patients (75 female) were included in the final analysis. Diastolic dysfunction at baseline was not associated with a higher dose of norepinephrine during anesthesia (P = .6953). The grade of diastolic dysfunction at baseline was associated with a decrease of the E/e' ratio during anesthesia (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find evidence for an association between diastolic dysfunction and impaired hemodynamic function, as expressed by high vasopressor support during anesthesia. Additionally, our findings suggest that diastolic function, as expressed by the E/e' ratio, does not worsen during anesthesia.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Geral , Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/fisiopatologia , Função Ventricular Esquerda , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Diástole , Ecocardiografia Doppler , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Disfunção Ventricular Esquerda/diagnóstico por imagem
5.
Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med ; 40(1): 100786, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33232835

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In early 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic outbreak has posed the risk of critical care resources overload in every affected country. Collective interhospital transport of critically ill COVID-19 patients as a way to mitigate the localised pressure from overloaded intensive care units at a national or international level has not been reported yet. The aim of this study was to provide descriptive data about the first six collective aeromedical evacuation (MEDEVAC) of COVID-19 patients performed within Europe. METHODS: This retrospective study included all adult patients transported by the first six collective MEDEVAC missions for COVID-19 patients performed within Europe on the 18th, 21st, 24th, 27th, 31st of March and the 3rd of April 2020. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) were transported aboard six MEDEVAC missions. The median duration of mechanical ventilation in ICU before transportation was 4 days (3-5.25). The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio obtained before, during the flight and at day 1 after the transport was 180 mmHg (156-202,5), 143 mmHg (118,75-184,75) and 174 mmHg (129,5-205,5), respectively, with no significant difference. The median norepinephrine infusion rate observed before, during the flight and at day 1 after the transport was 0,08 µg/kg-1. min-1 (0,00-0,20), 0,08 (0,00-0,25), and 0,07 (0,03-0,18), respectively, with no significant difference. No life-threatening event was reported. CONCLUSION: Collective aero-MEDEVAC of COVID-19 critically ill patients could provide a reliable solution to help control the burden of the disease at a national or international level.


Assuntos
Resgate Aéreo/estatística & dados numéricos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Idoso , Estado Terminal , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
6.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 138(11): 1168-1175, 2020 11 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33001144

RESUMO

Importance: Treatment of acquired blepharoptosis (ptosis) is currently limited to surgical intervention. Objective: To examine the efficacy and safety of oxymetazoline hydrochloride, 0.1%, ophthalmic solution (oxymetazoline, 0.1%) in participants with acquired ptosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pooled analysis of 2 randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 clinical trials included participants 9 years and older with acquired ptosis and superior visual field deficit. The 2 studies were conducted across 16 and 27 sites in the United States. Patients were enrolled from May 2015 to April 2019. Analyses for the individual trials were initiated after database lock and completed on September 6, 2017, and May 16, 2019. Pooled analysis was completed on August 25, 2019. Interventions: Participants (randomized 2:1) received oxymetazoline, 0.1%, or vehicle, self-administered as a single drop per eye, once daily, for 42 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was change from baseline in the number of points seen on the Leicester Peripheral Field Test, a test to detect superior visual field deficits due to ptosis, on days 1 (6 hours after instillation) and 14 (2 hours after instillation). The secondary end point, change from baseline in marginal reflex distance 1, was assessed at the same time points. Results: In total, 304 participants were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 63.8 [13.8] years; 222 women [73%]). Overall, 97.5% (198 of 203) of participants receiving oxymetazoline, 0.1%, and 97.0% (98 of 101) of participants receiving vehicle completed the studies. Oxymetazoline, 0.1%, was associated with a significant increase in the mean (SD) number of points seen on the Leicester Peripheral Field Test vs vehicle (day 1: 5.9 [6.4] vs 1.8 [4.1]; mean difference, 4.07 [95% CI, 2.74-5.39]; P < .001; day 14: 7.1 [5.9] vs 2.4 [5.5]; mean difference, 4.74 [95% CI, 3.43-6.04]; P < .001). Oxymetazoline, 0.1%, also was associated with a significant increase in marginal reflex distance 1 from baseline (mean [SD]: day 1: 0.96 [0.89] mm vs 0.50 [0.81] mm; mean difference, 0.47 mm [95% CI, 0.27-0.67]; P < .001; day 14: 1.16 [0.87] mm vs 0.50 [0.80] mm; mean difference, 0.67 mm [95% CI, 0.46-0.88]; P < .001). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 31.0% (63 of 203) of participants receiving oxymetazoline, 0.1%, and 35.6% (36 of 101) of participants receiving vehicle. Among participants receiving oxymetazoline, 0.1%, with a TEAE, 81% (51 of 63) had a maximum TEAE intensity of mild, and 62% (39 of 63) had no TEAE suspected of being treatment related. Conclusions and Relevance: Oxymetazoline, 0.1%, was associated with positive outcomes and was well tolerated in phase 3 trials after instillation at days 1 and 14, demonstrating its potential promise for the treatment of acquired ptosis, although further study is needed to elucidate the clinical relevance of these findings beyond 6 weeks.


Assuntos
Blefaroptose/tratamento farmacológico , Oximetazolina/administração & dosagem , Campos Visuais/efeitos dos fármacos , Adolescente , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Blefaroptose/fisiopatologia , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Soluções Oftálmicas , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 19(10): 929-934, 2020 10 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33026776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rosacea is a chronic skin condition characterized by primary and secondary manifestations affecting the centrofacial skin. The primary diagnostic phenotypes for rosacea are fixed centrofacial erythema with periodic intensification, and phymatous changes. Major phenotypes, including papules and pustules, flushing, telangiectasia, and ocular manifestations, may occur concomitantly or independently with the diagnostic features. The phenotypes of rosacea patients may evolve between subtypes and may require multiple treatments concurrently to be effectively managed. We report the proceedings of a roundtable discussion among 3 dermatologists experienced in the treatment of rosacea and present examples of rosacea treatment strategies that target multiple rosacea symptoms presenting in individual patients. METHODS: Three hypothetical cases describing patients representative of those commonly seen by practicing dermatologists were developed. A roundtable discussion was held to discuss overall and specific strategies for treating rosacea based on the cases. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: With few exceptions, the dermatologists recommended combination therapy targeting each manifestation of rosacea for each case. These recommendations are in agreement with the current American Acne and Rosacea Society treatment guidelines for rosacea and are supported by several studies demonstrating beneficial results from combining rosacea treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Rosacea is an evolving condition; care should take into account all clinical signs and symptoms of rosacea that are present in an individual patient, understanding that symptoms may change over time, and utilize combination therapy when applicable to target all rosacea symptoms. J Drugs Dermatol. 2020;19(10): 929-934. doi:10.36849/JDD.2020.5367.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Dermatologia/métodos , Terapia a Laser/métodos , Rosácea/terapia , Administração Cutânea , Adulto , Assistência ao Convalescente/métodos , Assistência ao Convalescente/normas , Cor , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/normas , Dermatologia/normas , Erros de Diagnóstico/prevenção & controle , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Ivermectina/administração & dosagem , Terapia a Laser/normas , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto/normas , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Rosácea/diagnóstico , Rosácea/etnologia , Rosácea/imunologia , Pele/efeitos dos fármacos , Pele/imunologia , Pigmentação da Pele , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos
8.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 14: 3559-3565, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32921989

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of intranasal dexmedetomidine and dexmedetomidine-ketamine premedication in preschool children undergoing tonsillectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We enrolled 66 children with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II, aged 3-7 years undergoing tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly allocated to receive intranasal premedication with either dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg-1 (Group D) or dexmedetomidine 2 µg kg-1 and ketamine 2 mg kg-1 (Group DK). The primary outcome was the sedation level assessed by the Modified Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (MOAA/S) 30 min after intervention. The minimal clinically relevant difference in the MOAA/S score was 0.5. Secondary outcomes included sedation onset time, parental separation anxiety, acceptance of mask induction, emergence time, emergence delirium, postoperative pain intensity, length of stay in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), and adverse effects. RESULTS: At 30 min after premedication, the MOAA/S score was lower in Group DK than in Group D patients (median: 1.0, interquartile range [IQR]: 1.0-2.0 vs median: 3.0, IQR: 2.0-3.0; P<0.001), with a median difference of 1.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-2.0, P<0.001). Patients in Group DK showed considerably faster onset of sedation (15 min, 95% CI: 14.2-15.8 min) than Group D (24 min, 95% CI: 23.2-24.8 min), with a median difference of 8.0 min (95% CI: 7.0-9.0 min, P<0.001). Both parental separation and facemask acceptance scores were lower in Group DK than in Group D patients (P=0.012 and P=0.001, respectively). There was no significant difference in emergence time, incidence of emergence delirium, postoperative pain scores, and length of stay in the PACU between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intranasal premedication with a combination of dexmedetomidine and ketamine produced better sedation for pediatric tonsillectomy than dexmedetomidine alone.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/farmacologia , Dexmedetomidina/farmacologia , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacologia , Ketamina/farmacologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Administração Intranasal , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória/cirurgia , Medicação Pré-Anestésica , Tonsilectomia
9.
Elife ; 92020 08 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32857037

RESUMO

How the brain dynamics change during anesthetic-induced altered states of consciousness is not completely understood. The α2-adrenergic agonists are unique. They generate unconsciousness selectively through α2-adrenergic receptors and related circuits. We studied intracortical neuronal dynamics during transitions of loss of consciousness (LOC) with the α2-adrenergic agonist dexmedetomidine and return of consciousness (ROC) in a functionally interconnecting somatosensory and ventral premotor network in non-human primates. LOC, ROC and full task performance recovery were all associated with distinct neural changes. The early recovery demonstrated characteristic intermediate dynamics distinguished by sustained high spindle activities. Awakening by the α2-adrenergic antagonist completely eliminated this intermediate state and instantaneously restored awake dynamics and the top task performance while the anesthetic was still being infused. The results suggest that instantaneous functional recovery is possible following anesthetic-induced unconsciousness and the intermediate recovery state is not a necessary path for the brain recovery.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Estado de Consciência/efeitos dos fármacos , Dexmedetomidina/administração & dosagem , Inconsciência/induzido quimicamente , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/administração & dosagem , Animais , Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Eletroencefalografia , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos , Imidazóis/administração & dosagem , Macaca , Masculino , Inconsciência/fisiopatologia , Vigília/efeitos dos fármacos
10.
Expert Opin Pharmacother ; 21(5): 567-580, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286097

RESUMO

Introduction: Though many unanswered questions about the pathophysiology of Tourette Syndrome remain, several pharmacotherapies for tics have been studied, with varying results in terms of efficacy and the strength of evidence.Areas covered: This literature review encompasses pharmacotherapies for tics. The pharmacotherapies discussed in this review include: alpha agonists, antipsychotics, topiramate, botulinum toxin, and dopamine depleters.Expert opinion: Once the presence of tics is confirmed and psychoeducation and support are provided to patients and caregivers, one must examine the degree of tic-related impairment and the presence of psychiatric comorbidities. These factors influence treatment decisions as the presence of comorbidity and related impairment may shift the treatment target. When selecting a medication for tics, the presence of ADHD (the most frequent comorbidity) strengthens the case for choosing an alpha agonist. The case for antipsychotic medications is strongest when tic-related impairment is severe and/or the tics are refractory to more conservative measures. All medications require drug safety monitoring procedures and reevaluation over time.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/uso terapêutico , Antipsicóticos/uso terapêutico , Transtornos de Tique/tratamento farmacológico , Tiques/tratamento farmacológico , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/efeitos adversos , Antipsicóticos/administração & dosagem , Antipsicóticos/efeitos adversos , Benzamidas/administração & dosagem , Benzamidas/efeitos adversos , Benzamidas/uso terapêutico , Toxinas Botulínicas/administração & dosagem , Toxinas Botulínicas/efeitos adversos , Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapêutico , Comorbidade , Humanos , Transtornos de Tique/epidemiologia , Transtornos de Tique/psicologia , Tiques/epidemiologia , Tiques/psicologia , Síndrome de Tourette/tratamento farmacológico , Síndrome de Tourette/epidemiologia , Síndrome de Tourette/psicologia
12.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 9(5): e015076, 2020 03 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32070203

RESUMO

Background We previously reported that pralidoxime facilitated restoration of spontaneous circulation by potentiating the pressor effect of epinephrine. We determined the optimal dose of pralidoxime during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and evaluated the involvement of α-adrenoceptors in its pressor action. Methods and Results Forty-four pigs randomly received 1 of 3 doses of pralidoxime (40, 80, or 120 mg/kg) or saline placebo during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including epinephrine administration. Pralidoxime at 40 mg/kg produced the highest coronary perfusion pressure, whereas 120 mg/kg of pralidoxime produced the lowest coronary perfusion pressure. Restoration of spontaneous circulation was attained in 4 (36.4%), 11 (100%), 9 (81.8%), and 3 (27.3%) animals in the saline, 40, 80, and 120 mg/kg groups, respectively (P<0.001). In 49 rats, arterial pressure response to 40 mg/kg of pralidoxime was determined after saline, guanethidine, phenoxybenzamine, or phentolamine pretreatment, and the response to 200 mg/kg pf pralidoxime was determined after saline, propranolol, or phentolamine pretreatment. Pralidoxime at 40 mg/kg elicited a pressor response. Phenoxybenzamine completely inhibited the pressor response, but guanethidine and phentolamine did not. The pressor response of pralidoxime was even greater after guanethidine or phentolamine pretreatment. Pralidoxime at 200 mg/kg produced an initial vasodepressor response followed by a delayed pressor response. Unlike propranolol, phentolamine eliminated the initial vasodepressor response. Conclusions Pralidoxime at 40 mg/kg administered with epinephrine improved restoration of spontaneous circulation rate by increasing coronary perfusion pressure in a pig model of cardiac arrest, whereas 120 mg/kg did not improve coronary perfusion pressure or restoration of spontaneous circulation rate. The pressor effect of pralidoxime was unrelated to α-adrenoceptors and buffered by its vasodepressor action mediated by sympathoinhibition.


Assuntos
Reanimação Cardiopulmonar , Reativadores da Colinesterase/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Compostos de Pralidoxima/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Pressão Sanguínea , Circulação Coronária , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Suínos
13.
Vet Anaesth Analg ; 47(2): 267-273, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32007444

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of epidural phentolamine on the duration of anaesthesia following epidural injection of lidocaine-epinephrine. STUDY DESIGN: Blinded randomized experimental study. ANIMALS: A group of 12 adult ewes weighing 25.7 ± 2.3 kg and aged 8-9 months. METHODS: All sheep were administered epidural lidocaine (approximately 4 mg kg-1) and epinephrine (5 µg mL-1). Of these, six sheep were randomized into three epidural treatments, separated by 1 week, administered 30 minutes after lidocaine-epinephrine: SAL: normal saline, PHE1: phentolamine (1 mg) and PHE2: phentolamine (2 mg). The other six sheep were administered only epidural lidocaine-epinephrine: treatment LIDEP. Each injection was corrected to 5 mL using 0.9% saline. Noxious stimuli were pinpricks with a hypodermic needle and skin pinch with haemostatic forceps to determine the onset and duration of sensory and motor block. Heart rate, noninvasive mean arterial pressure (MAP), respiratory rate and rectal temperature were recorded. RESULTS: The onset times were not different among treatments. Duration of sensory block was significantly shorter in SAL (57.5 ± 6.2 minutes), PHE1 (60.7 ± 9.0 minutes) and PHE2 (62.0 ± 6.7 minutes) than in LIDEP (81.7 ± 13.4 minutes) (p < 0.05). Duration of motor blockade was significantly shorter in PHE1 (59.4 ± 5.4 minutes) and PHE2 (54.3 ± 4.0 minutes) than in SAL (84.8 ± 7.0 minutes) and LIDEP (91.5 ± 18.2 minutes) (p < 0.01). MAP in PHE2 was decreased at 10 minutes after administration of phentolamine (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Epidural administration of 5 mL normal saline after epidural injection of lidocaine-epinephrine reduced the duration of sensory but not motor block in sheep. Epidural administration of phentolamine diluted to the final volume of 5 mL diminished both the duration of sensory and motor block in sheep administered epidural lidocaine-epinephrine.


Assuntos
Anestesia Epidural/veterinária , Epinefrina/farmacologia , Injeções Epidurais/veterinária , Lidocaína/farmacologia , Fentolamina/farmacologia , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/farmacologia , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos alfa/farmacologia , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/farmacologia , Animais , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Comitê de Farmácia e Terapêutica , Ovinos
14.
Einstein (Sao Paulo) ; 18: eRW5055, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês, Português | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31994613

RESUMO

The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of different doses, times for infusion of the first dose, intervals of administration of subsequent doses, and number of epinephrine doses in the survival of children and adolescents who went into cardiorespiratory arrest. It is a review study with data from the PubMedⓇ/MEDLINEⓇdatabase. The search was for articles published from January 1st, 2000 to February 10, 2019, with a sample of patients aged under 18 years, published in English, Portuguese and Spanish. We found 222 articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The first dose should be given as soon as possible. The standard dose (0.01mg/kg) has a better outcome when compared to the higher dose (0.1mg/kg). There is an iⓇverse relation between the number of epinephrine doses and survival. The interval currently recommended between doses has lower survival when compared to larger intervals. The dosage recommended by the American Heart Association presents a better outcome for survival, but the interval between doses and the maximum number of doses should be better assessed.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Criança , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo
16.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol ; 30(2): 81-86, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31621385

RESUMO

Objective: To examine medication prescribing patterns for preschool-aged children with diagnoses of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or disruptive behavior disorder (DBD). Secondary objectives included determining if prescription patterns varied by gender, insurance type, or comorbid diagnosis of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional chart review was completed for children ages 2-5 years who were treated at an academic medical center between 2013 and 2016 with a diagnosis of ADHD and/or DBD. Data were analyzed by Fisher's exact and chi-square tests and Cochran-Armitage trend analysis. Results: Of the 966 children who met inclusion criteria, 343 (35.5%) were prescribed ADHD medications. For 2-, 3-, and 4-year olds, the most commonly prescribed medication was an alpha agonist (AA), while for 5-year olds, methylphenidate (MPH) was most commonly prescribed. With advancing age, an increasing number of children were prescribed a stimulant medication and a decreasing number of children were prescribed an AA (p < 0.001). Children were more often prescribed an MPH formulation (48.2%) compared with amphetamine-based stimulants (26.8%). Children without ASD were more likely to be prescribed a stimulant medication (72.1%) when compared with children with ASD (37.0%, p < 0.0001). Children with private insurance were more likely to be prescribed an extended-release stimulant medication when compared with Medicaid patients (34.3% vs. 17.2%, p = 0.004). Conclusion: Both stimulants and nonstimulants are being prescribed regularly in very young children, even before the age of four at an academic medical center. AAs were the most commonly prescribed medication for children 2, 3, and 4 years of age with diagnoses of ADHD, DBD, and ASD. Insurance type, comorbid diagnosis of ASD, and age of child were found to be significantly associated with prescribing a nonpreferred medication.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos de Deficit da Atenção e do Comportamento Disruptivo/tratamento farmacológico , Estimulantes do Sistema Nervoso Central/administração & dosagem , Fatores Etários , Anfetamina/administração & dosagem , Transtorno do Espectro Autista/tratamento farmacológico , Pré-Escolar , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Seguro Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Metilfenidato/administração & dosagem , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
18.
Einstein (Säo Paulo) ; 18: eRW5055, 2020. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1056057

RESUMO

ABSTRACT The objective of the present study was to assess the efficacy of different doses, times for infusion of the first dose, intervals of administration of subsequent doses, and number of epinephrine doses in the survival of children and adolescents who went into cardiorespiratory arrest. It is a review study with data from the PubMedⓇ/MEDLINEⓇdatabase. The search was for articles published from January 1st, 2000 to February 10, 2019, with a sample of patients aged under 18 years, published in English, Portuguese and Spanish. We found 222 articles, of which 16 met the inclusion criteria of the study. The first dose should be given as soon as possible. The standard dose (0.01mg/kg) has a better outcome when compared to the higher dose (0.1mg/kg). There is an iⓇverse relation between the number of epinephrine doses and survival. The interval currently recommended between doses has lower survival when compared to larger intervals. The dosage recommended by the American Heart Association presents a better outcome for survival, but the interval between doses and the maximum number of doses should be better assessed.


RESUMO O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a eficácia de diferentes doses, tempos para infusão da primeira dose, intervalos de administração de doses subsequentes e número de doses de epinefrina na sobrevida de crianças e adolescentes que sofreram parada cardiorrespiratória. Trata-se de estudo de revisão, cujas buscas foram feitas na base de dados PubMedⓇ /MEDLINEⓇ. Foram selecionados artigos publicados de 1° de janeiro de 2000 até 10 de fevereiro de 2019, realizados em menores de 18 anos de idade, publicados em inglês, português e espanhol. Foram encontrados 222 artigos, dos quais 16 atenderam os critérios de inclusão no estudo. A primeira dose deve ser aplicada o mais rápido possível. A dose padrão (0,01mg/kg) apresenta melhor desfecho quando comparada à dose alta (0,1mg/kg). Houve relação inversa entre número de doses de epinefrina e sobrevida. O intervalo entre doses recomendado atualmente apresenta menor sobrevida quando comparado a intervalos maiores. A dose recomendada pela American Heart Association apresenta melhor desfecho para sobrevida, porém o intervalo entre doses e o número máximo de doses devem ser melhor avaliados.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Parada Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Fatores de Tempo , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Parada Cardíaca/mortalidade
19.
Pharmacol Rep ; 71(6): 1095-1103, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31629939

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The regulation of the immune system by the sympathetic nervous system is allowing the design of novel treatments for inflammatory disorders such as arthritis. In this study, we have analyzed the effects of α- and ß-adrenoceptor agonists injected subcutaneously, intrathecally, or intra-articularly in zymosan-induced arthritis. METHODS: Murine arthritis was induced by intra-articular (knee joint) injection of zymosan. α1 (phenylephrine), α2 (clonidine), ß1 (dobutamine), or ß2 (salbutamol)-adrenoceptor agonists were injected subcutaneously (sc), intrathecally (it), or intra-articularly (ia) to activate peripheral, spinal, or intra-articular adrenoceptors and to study their effects on articular edema formation and neutrophil migration into the synovial cavity. RESULTS: Treatments with phenylephrine did not affect the edema formation, but it increased neutrophil migration when injected subcutaneously (155.3%) or intra-articularly (187.7%). Treatments with clonidine inhibited neutrophil migration (59.9% sc, 68.7% it, 42.8% ia) regardless of the route of administration, but it inhibited edema formation only when injected intrathecally (66.7%) or intra-articularly (36%) but not subcutaneously. Treatments with dobutamine inhibited both edema (42.0% sc, 69.5% it, 61.6% ia) and neutrophil migration (28.4% sc, 70.3% it, 82.4% ia) in a concentration dependent manner. Likewise, all the treatments with salbutamol also inhibited edema formation (89.9% sc, 62.4% it, 69.8% ia) and neutrophil migration (76.6% sc, 39.1% it, 71.7% ia). CONCLUSION: Whereas the ß-adrenoceptor agonists induced anti-inflammatory effects regardless of their route of administration, α1- and α2-adrenoceptor agonists induced either pro- and anti-inflammatory effects, respectively.


Assuntos
Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/administração & dosagem , Agonistas alfa-Adrenérgicos/farmacologia , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/administração & dosagem , Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/farmacologia , Artrite Experimental/tratamento farmacológico , Albuterol/administração & dosagem , Albuterol/farmacologia , Animais , Movimento Celular/efeitos dos fármacos , Clonidina/administração & dosagem , Clonidina/farmacologia , Dobutamina/administração & dosagem , Dobutamina/farmacologia , Edema/tratamento farmacológico , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Injeções Espinhais , Articulação do Joelho , Masculino , Camundongos , Neutrófilos/efeitos dos fármacos , Fenilefrina/administração & dosagem , Fenilefrina/farmacologia , Zimosan
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...